It’s no secret that driving an electric vehicle can be good for the environment. Removing fossil fuels from at least the driving side of the vehicle equation can result in lower tailpipe emissions, and that’s before diving into the extraction of the fuels themselves. Unfortunately, an EV owner’s feel-good mentality doesn’t always account for the materials and energy used to build the vehicle.
A recent study by Reuters aims to clarify just how clean and green your electric machine is. The global news organization worked with a data model to determine the point in an EV’s lifespan at which it becomes cleaner to operate than a comparable gas-powered vehicle.
Argonne National Laboratory in Chicago developed the model for the study, which took thousands of parameters into account to perform an environmental assessment of EVs. The Argonne Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Technologies (GREET) model considers everything from the type of metals in an EV’s battery to the number of plastics used to build vehicles to measure the overall impact of a vehicle on the environment.
The so-called “payback period,” or the point at which an EV becomes cleaner to both manufacture and operate than a comparable gas-powered vehicle, also depends on the battery’s size and construction, as well as on the grid’s power source. Building an EV generates more carbon than building a car powered by an internal combustion engine because the process of extracting, processing, and transporting the minerals needed to make the batteries is a dirty business. It isn’t until a car is on the road for awhile that the environmental benefits of an EV overtake the carbon emissions created during its manufacture.
In one example, the Argonne model compared a Tesla Model 3 and a Toyota Corolla, purchased and driven in the United States, where coal power makes up nearly a quarter of all electricity generation. In this comparison, the Tesla had to travel 13,500 miles before it surpassed the Corolla. That’s a year or more of driving for most people.
The benefits arrive sooner for drivers in a country with a greener electrical grid. In Norway, where hydropower is king, Tesla’s Model 3 overtakes the Corolla after 8,400 miles.
If you’re wondering about the payback period for your state, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) developed an online tool using the Argonne GREET model to help. It gives users the ability to view a breakdown of electricity sources in their state, as well as an estimate of emissions from EVs based on those sources.
Not everyone agrees with Argonne’s assessment. For example, Damien Ernst from the University of Liege claims that an EV would need to travel between 67,000 and 151,000 kilometers (41,632 to 93,827 miles) before the breakeven point occurs. In addition, the American Petroleum Institute’s website notes that various types of powertrain configurations emit similar levels of greenhouse gases over their lifetimes.
Reuters is the source of information for this article. It was accurate on June 29, 2021, but it may have changed since that date.
The Ford Transit is the automaker’s full-size cargo and passenger van offering, designed to serve a wide range of commercial and lifestyle applications. With 37 available configurations, the platform ...See More
Read the Full Article
The Chevrolet Tahoe is a full-size, three-row SUV with a standard V8 engine and available diesel power. Built on the same platform as the Chevrolet Silverado 1500 pickup, the Tahoe benefits from its ...See More
Read the Full Article
It is the end of the line for the Ford Escape. After 25 years as a fixture of Ford’s lineup, 2026 will be the compact SUV’s last model year.
Read the Full Article
The Colorado is Chevrolet’s midsize pickup. It ranks among the segment’s most capable trucks for payload and towing, and can be configured for both work and off-road adventures. For 2026, the ...See More
Read the Full Article