J.D. Power Ratings

For additional J.D. Power ratings data, please visit www.jdpower.com/cars and www.jdpower.com/ratings.

Miami-Dade County, Seattle Public Utilities, NYC Environmental Protection and St. Paul Regional Water Services Rank Highest in Respective Regions

COSTA MESA, Calif.: 17 May 2017 — Nearly one-third (32%) of residential customers reported some type of water quality problem in the past year, according to the J.D. Power 2017 Water Utility Residential Customer Satisfaction Study,SM released today. Among the specific problems reported, pressure too low, bad taste, discoloration and scaling/water hardness had the most significant negative effect on customer satisfaction.

“There is a significant need for major investment in water infrastructure nationwide and in order for the water utilities to be able to make that investment, getting the backing of their customers is going to be key,” said Andrew Heath, senior director of the utility practice at J.D. Power.  “Understanding the voice of the customer—both in terms of what specific factors drive negative sentiment and which are most closely associated with positive performance—will be central to water utilities’ ability to achieve the customer support necessary to support the improvements they need.”

The J.D. Power 2017 Water Utility Residential Customer Satisfaction Study measures satisfaction among residential customers of 87 water utilities each delivering water to a population of at least 400,000 people and reported in four geographic regions: Midwest, Northeast, South and West. Overall satisfaction is measured by examining 33 attributes within six factors (listed in order of importance): delivery; price; conservation; billing and payment; communications; and customer service. Satisfaction is calculated on a 1,000-point scale.

Following are the key findings of the 2017 study:

  • Bad taste and hard water have significant effect on satisfaction: Customers who experienced water quality problems had significantly lower delivery satisfaction scores than those who experienced no problems. Bad taste and scaling/water hardness were associated with a 129-index point decline in delivery satisfaction scores, while bad smell was associated with a 135-point decline and discoloration was associated with a 115-point decline.
  • Awareness of conservation, environmental initiatives increases satisfaction: When customers are aware of their utility’s conservation programs, conservation satisfaction scores leap to 711 vs. 561 among those who have no awareness. Likewise, awareness of the utility’s efforts to improve the environment is associated with a conservation satisfaction score of 785 vs. 634 among those who are unaware of such efforts.
  • Communication, news media recall builds satisfying relationships: Water utilities that communicate with their customers are more likely to build satisfying customer relationships. Communications satisfaction score is higher when a customer recalls a communication in the last three months from their water utility than when they don’t recall a communication (714 vs. 612, respectively). This trend also holds when customers recall hearing about their water utility in the news media (677) versus those who do not (637).
  • Frequent communication maximizes satisfaction: Customers who recall receiving six or more communications from their water utility have communications satisfaction scores that are 203 points higher than those who do not recall receiving any direct communications.
  • E-bill satisfaction higher than paper bill: Billing and payment satisfaction among the 30% of customers who receive their bill electronically is much higher than among those who receive a paper bill (788 vs. 747, respectively).  

Study Rankings by Region

The following utilities rank highest in customer satisfaction in their respective regions:

  • Midwest: Saint Paul Regional Water Services
  • Northeast: NYC Environmental Protection
  • South: Miami-Dade County
  • West: Seattle Public Utilities

The 2017 Water Utility Residential Customer Satisfaction Study is based on more than 40,000 responses, representing more than 87 million residential customers of the 87 largest water utilities across the United States. The study was fielded in four waves between June 2016 and March 2017. 

For more information about the 2017 Water Utility Residential Customer Satisfaction, visit http://www.jdpower.com/resource/us-water-utility-residential-customer-satisfaction-study

J.D. Power is a global leader in consumer insights, advisory services and data and analytics. These capabilities enable J.D. Power to help its clients drive customer satisfaction, growth and profitability. Established in 1968, J.D. Power is headquartered in Costa Mesa, Calif., and has offices serving North/South America, Asia Pacific and Europe.

Media Relations Contacts
Geno Effler; Costa Mesa, Calif.; 714-621-6224; media.relations@jdpa.com
John Roderick; St. James, N.Y.; 631-584-2200; john@jroderick.com

About J.D. Power and Advertising/Promotional Rules  www.jdpower.com/about-us/press-release-info

J.D. Power 2017 Water Utility Residential Customer Satisfaction Study
J.D. Power 2017 Water Utility Residential Customer Satisfaction Study
J.D. Power 2017 Water Utility Residential Customer Satisfaction Study
J.D. Power 2017 Water Utility Residential Customer Satisfaction Study

Media Contacts:

Geno Effler

Costa Mesa, California

(714) 621-6224

media.relations@jdpa.com